Vol. 8, Special Issue 3, Part D (2024)
Sensory characteristics of developed probiotic chicken meat spread fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus
Author(s):
Namrata Agrawal, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Surbhi Yadav, Swati Gupta, Akshay Garg, Ranvijay Singh, Bhavana Gupta and Sanjay Shukla
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to develop a probiotic chicken meat spread fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus (LAB) and malted sorghum flour as a substrate, and to assess its quality during storage for 16 days at refrigeration temperature. Chicken meat spread formulations were prepared by adding malted sorghum flour at levels of 0%, 2%, 4%, and 6% as a substrate, along with Lactobacillus acidophilus at a concentration of 1 million cfu/g of product. Different formulations, labeled as C (meat spread only), C1 (meat spread with 0% malted sorghum flour + LAB), T1 (meat spread with 2% malted sorghum flour + LAB), T2 (meat spread with 4% malted sorghum flour + LAB), and T3 (meat spread With 6% malted sorghum flour + LAB), were evaluated for their storage stability at refrigeration temperature for 16 days, with sensory attributes being analyzed. Sensory evaluation of the products revealed a significant (p≤0.05) decline in color and appearance, flavor, juiciness, texture, sourness, mouth coating, spreadability and overall acceptability in all the groups throughout the study, however, there was a substantial difference which was significant (p≤0.05) among all the groups indicating the superiority of T2 group followed by T1. In conclusion, the addition of 4% malted sorghum flour to chicken meat spread, along with LAB, showed positive effects on its sensory attributes, resulting in Appreciable quality probiotic chicken meat spread.
Pages: 271-278 | 454 Views 221 Downloads
How to cite this article:
Namrata Agrawal, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Surbhi Yadav, Swati Gupta, Akshay Garg, Ranvijay Singh, Bhavana Gupta and Sanjay Shukla. Sensory characteristics of developed probiotic chicken meat spread fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus. Int. J. Adv. Biochem. Res. 2024;8(3S):271-278. DOI: 10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i3Sd.721