Vol. 9, Issue 5, Part C (2025)

Development of an analytical method for extraction and determination of organophosphate pesticides residues from paddy and rice bran by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric

Author(s):

Rana Vinay Kumar Verma and Jyoti Sharma

Abstract:

This study involves development of multiresidue low cost, effective and quick, modified QUECHERS (Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged and Safe) extraction method and extract clean-up with MgSO4, PSA & SPE including direct sample injection without clean-up at different spike levels in combination with high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometric with electrospray ionization (UPLC-MSMS-ESI) was performed. To study recovery efficiencies samples were spiked at 5, 10, 20 and 50 µg/kg in rice bran and paddy. Recoveries in rice bran from mixed clean-up of MgSO4, PSA and C18 were ranged between 70-120% except at 5µg/kg where recovery of chlorpyrifos, formothion and phosalone were less than 70% and all the RSD calculated were found to be less than 20% for spike level of 5, 10, 20 and 50 µg/kg. Recoveries from individual clean-up reagents i.e., MgSO4 and PSA were also within range of 70-120% (N=6) and RSD of less than 20% but recovery by solid phase extraction (SPE) were found to be ranged between i.e., 47-89% (N=6) at 20 µg/kg but were improved at higher spike level of 50µg/kg. Calibration curve linearity has coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.995 or higher starting from 5.0 to 200 µg/kg. Developed method successfully demonstrate the capability to quickly and efficiently determine multiresidue organophosphate pesticides in both rice bran and paddy crop by single LC-TQ-MS.

Pages: 240-251  |  229 Views  109 Downloads

How to cite this article:
Rana Vinay Kumar Verma and Jyoti Sharma. Development of an analytical method for extraction and determination of organophosphate pesticides residues from paddy and rice bran by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric. Int. J. Adv. Biochem. Res. 2025;9(5):240-251. DOI: 10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i5c.4319